Giải đề thi IELTS Writing Task 2 ngày 23/07/2023 – Dạng Opinion Essay – Free IELTS Writing Sample
Đề thi IELTS Writing Task 2 ngày 23/07/2023 là đề bài dạng Opinion Essay. IPPEDU sẽ giúp bạn phân tích đề bài và đưa ra bài Sample Essay Band 8.0 để bạn nắm cách lên ý tưởng, diễn đạt chính xác ideas, viết câu có nghĩa, và bố cục một bài essay Writing Task 2 hiệu quả nhé!
1. Đề thi IELTS Writing Task 2 ngày 23/07/2023
Some people think that charity organizations should only offer help to people of their own country. However, others believe that these organizations should give aid to people in great need wherever they live. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
2. Từ vựng hữu ích
- Charitable work: Công việc từ thiện
- Needy individuals: Những người cần giúp đỡ
- Philanthropic organizations: Tổ chức từ thiện
- Fellow citizens: Đồng bào
- Dire poverty: Nghèo đói cùng cực
- Basic life sustenance: Nhu cầu cơ bản để duy trì cuộc sống
- Financial subsidies: Hỗ trợ tài chính
- Benefactors: Nhà tài trợ, người hảo tâm
- Geographical boundary: Biên giới địa lý
- Underprivileged individuals: Những cá nhân kém may mắn
- Global scale: Quy mô toàn cầu
- National crises: Khủng hoảng quốc gia
- Natural catastrophes: Thảm họa thiên nhiên
- Foreign donations: Quyên góp từ nước ngoài
- Goodwill: Thiện chí, lòng tốt
3. Bài mẫu – IELTS Sample Band 8.0+ cho đề thi IELTS Writing Task 2 ngày 23/07/2023
Many people opine that charitable work should only be undertaken within one’s own nation, whereas others argue that needy individuals should be supported irrespective of their nationality or place of living. The following essay will elaborate on both perspectives before expressing my personal viewpoint on this contentious matter.
On the one hand, the assumption that philanthropic organizations should only provide aid to civilians of their country is legitimate to a certain extent. To begin with, it stands to reason that for every domestic charitable institution, fellow citizens come in top priority. Since there still exist numerous individuals living in dire poverty and struggling to attain basic life sustenance, it would be more advisable to chiefly focus on destitute ones in their nation rather than offering support elsewhere. In addition, voluntary agencies primarily receive financial subsidies from such benefactors as local individuals, businesses and foundations, who would prioritize the improvement of their own citizens. Given this reliance on domestic sources, that these donations are used to help people of their country is understandable.
On the other hand, it is also justifiable to claim that charity work should not be confined within geographical boundaries. Indeed, charitable organizations with sufficient funding sources, specifically international ones, are entitled to support underprivileged individuals of any nationality. These agencies operate on a global scale and obtain financial backing from multiple governments, as exemplified in cases of UNICEF or the Red Cross, thereby having the responsibility of providing aid universally. Furthermore, there are certain circumstances in which domestic philanthropic resources would not suffice. This can particularly be observed in several situations namely national crises or natural catastrophes, which entail foreign donations so as to ensure adequate assistance for all people in need.
In conclusion, advocates of both opinions indisputably have valid arguments for their convictions. Personally, I would contend that charities, either on a large or small scale, should make concerted efforts to help disadvantaged people wherever they live, because goodwill has no borders.
Các bạn lưu lại bài viết để tham khảo và học thật tốt IELTS Writing nhé!
Hãy ghé IPPEdu ngay để có cơ hội được học trực tiếp với các giáo viên IELTS 8.0+ giúp nâng cao kỹ năng writing của mình nha! Để biết được trình độ của mình đang ở level nào thì bạn có thể tham gia Test miễn phí tại IPPEdu nhé!
Theo dõi ngay fanpage IPP IELTS – A Holistic Approach to IELTS để nhận được thêm những nội dung hấp dẫn bạn nhé!
